<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://coughjournal.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Cough - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Cough</description>
        <dc:date>2010-02-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/1/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/2/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/6/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/3/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/3/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/1/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/3/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/4/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/3" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/1/1/7">
        <title>Cough: are children really different to adults?</title>
        <description>Worldwide paediatricians advocate that children should be managed differently from adults. In this article, similarities and differences between children and adults related to cough are presented. Physiologically, the cough pathway is closely linked to the control of breathing (the central respiratory pattern generator). As respiratory control and associated reflexes undergo a maturation process, it is expected that the cough would likewise undergo developmental stages as well. Clinically, the &apos;big three&apos; causes of chronic cough in adults (asthma, post-nasal drip and gastroesophageal reflux) are far less common causes of chronic cough in children. This has been repeatedly shown by different groups in both clinical and epidemiological studies. Therapeutically, some medications used empirically for cough in adults have little role in paediatrics. For example, anti-histamines (in particular H1 antagonists) recommended as a front-line empirical treatment of chronic cough in adults have no effect in paediatric cough. Instead it is associated with adverse reactions and toxicity. Similarly, codeine and its derivatives used widely for cough in adults are not efficacious in children and are contraindicated in young children. Corticosteroids, the other front-line empirical therapy recommended for adults, are also minimally (if at all) efficacious for treating non-specific cough in children. In summary, current data support that management guidelines for paediatric cough should be different to those in adults as the aetiological factors and treatment in children significantly differ to those in adults.</description>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com/content/1/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Anne Chang</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Cough 2005, 1:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2005-09-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-9974-1-7</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Cough</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-9974</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2005-09-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/2/1/3">
        <title>Identification of acid reflux cough using serial assays of exhaled breath condensate pH</title>
        <description>Background:
Chronic cough is a common problem, frequently caused or exacerbated by acid reflux. Diagnosis of acid reflux cough is haphazard currently, often relying on long therapeutic trials of expensive medications. We tested the hypothesis that the most relevant mechanistic component of acid reflux in chronic cough is when it rises to the level of the airway where acid can potentially be aspirated. We further wished to determine if multi-sample exhaled breath condensate (EBC) pH profiles can identify chronic cough patients likely to respond to proton pump inhibitor therapy.
Methods:
59 subjects were recruited for this study. Initially we examined EBC pH (gas-standardized with Argon) in the setting of 15 experimental pharyngeal acid challenges to determine duration of EBC acidification. Subsequently, we enrolled 22 healthy subjects to determine a normal multi-sample exhaled breath condensate pH profile over 1&#8211;3 days. We additionally obtained multi-sample EBC pH profiles in 22 patients with chronic cough. These samples were timed to occur after coughing episodes. Exhaled breath condensate pH was measured after gas standardization.
Results:
We found that exhaled breath condensate pH is substantially reduced for approximately 15 minutes after pharyngeal acid load. Healthy subjects rarely have any low EBC pH values (defined as &lt; 7.4 based on a normative reference range from 404 healthy subjects). Patients with chronic cough who subsequently responded well to proton pump inhibition (n = 8) invariably had one or more cough episodes associated with EBC acidification. No patient who had normal EBC pH with each of their cough episodes reported a clinically relevant response to proton-pump inhibition.
Conclusion:
Patients whose cough responds to proton pump inhibition have transient exhaled breath condensate acidification with coughing episodes, supporting the role of airway acidification in reflux-triggered cough. Multi-sample EBC pH profiles, involving samples collected immediately subsequent to a coughing episode, may be useful appropriately to direct therapy to those patients with cough who have relevant acid reflux.</description>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com/content/2/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>John Hunt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yuanlin Yu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James Burns</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Benjamin Gaston</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lina Ngamtrakulpanit</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dorothy Bunyan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Brian Walsh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alison Smith</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stephanie Hom</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Cough 2006, 2:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-04-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-9974-2-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Cough</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-9974</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-04-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/11">
        <title>Acute cough: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge</title>
        <description>Background:
Acute cough is one of the most common complaints prompting patient visits to healthcare professionals. Despite the broad repercussions of acute cough on patient quality of life, school and work productivity, and public health resources, research on this condition is minimal, as are the available treatment options. Many patients use over-the-counter medicines, which are often ineffective for symptom relief. Some therapies may achieve antitussive activity, but at the expense of unpleasant or intolerable side effects.Unmet needsWhen considering the treatments currently available for the management of acute cough, the multiple limitations of such treatments are quite apparent. Most of these treatments lack clinically proven efficacy and reliability to support their use. This reinforces the need for the generation of quality scientific data from well-performed clinical trials. Hopefully, the result will be the development of safer, more effective and more reliable therapeutic options in the management of acute cough.Cough assessment and managementAcute cough can be due to a variety of causes, and it is worthwhile to consider these pathogenic factors in some detail. It is also important to be familiar with the effects that acute cough has on patients&apos; quality of life, work productivity, and the healthcare system; proper awareness of these effects may contribute to better understanding of the social impact of cough. In reference to the available treatments for the management of acute cough, adequate knowledge of the type of over-the-counter and prescription products in the market, as well as their mode of action and advantages/disadvantages, may provide expanded pharmacotherapeutic opportunities and facilitate better clinical decisions. However, due to the drawbacks of current treatment options, ideas for future cough management and newer products need to be considered and tested.
Conclusion:
In view of the socio-economic impact of acute cough and the limitations of available treatments, a renewed interest in the management of acute cough needs to be encouraged. The current strategies for acute cough management need to be reassessed, with a focus on developing new, reliable products and formulations with proven efficacy and safety.</description>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Peter Dicpinigaitis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gene Colice</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mary Jo Goolsby</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gary Rogg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sheldon Spector</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Birgit Winther</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Cough 2009, 5:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-9974-5-11</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Cough</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-9974</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/6/1/1">
        <title>Perception of urge-to-cough and dyspnea in healthy smokers with decreased cough reflex sensitivity</title>
        <description>Background:
Although cigarette smoking has been implicated as an important risk factor for the development of respiratory symptoms, the perceptional aspects of two symptoms in smokers have not been fully elucidated. Therefore, we simultaneously evaluated the cough reflex sensitivity, the cognition of urge-to-cough and perception of dyspnea in both healthy smokers and non-smokers.
Methods:
Fourteen male healthy never-smokers and 14 age-matched male healthy current-smokers were recruited via public postings. The cough reflex sensitivity and the urge-to-cough were evaluated by the inhalation of citric acid. The perception of dyspnea was evaluated by Borg scores during applications of external inspiratory resistive loads.
Results:
The cough reflex threshold to citric acid, as expressed by the lowest concentration of citric acid that elicited two or more coughs (C2) and the lowest concentration of citric acid that elicited five or more coughs (C5) in smokers was significantly higher than in non-smokers. The urge-to-cough log-log slope in smokers was significantly milder than that of non-smokers. There were no significant differences in the urge-to-cough threshold between non-smokers and smokers. There were no significant differences in perceptions of dyspnea between non-smokers and smokers.
Conclusions:
The study showed that decreased cough reflex sensitivity in healthy smokers was accompanied by a decreased cognition of urge-to-cough whereas it was not accompanied by the alternation of perception of dyspnea. Physicians should pay attention to the perceptual alterations of cough in smokers.</description>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com/content/6/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Masashi Kanezaki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Satoru Ebihara</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Etsuhiro Nikkuni</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peijun Gui</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chihiro Suda</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Takae Ebihara</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Miyako Yamasaki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Masahiro Kohzuki</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Cough 2010, 6:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-9974-6-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Cough</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-9974</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/3/1/7">
        <title>Obstructive sleep apnoea: a cause of chronic cough</title>
        <description>Chronic cough is a common reason for presentation to both general practice and respiratory clinics. In up to 25% of cases, the cause remains unclear after extensive investigations. We report 4 patients presenting with an isolated chronic cough who were subsequently found to have obstructive sleep apnoea. The cough improved rapidly with nocturnal continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Further studies are required to investigate the prevalence of coexistence of these common conditions.</description>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com/content/3/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Surinder Birring</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alvin Ing</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kevin Chan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gavina Cossa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sergio Matos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Morgan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ian Pavord</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Cough 2007, 3:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-07-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-9974-3-7</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Cough</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-9974</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-07-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/3/1/8">
        <title>Central and peripheral mechanisms of narcotic antitussives: codeine-sensitive and -resistant coughs. </title>
        <description>Narcotic antitussives such as codeine reveal the antitussive effect primarily via the &#956;-opioid receptor in the central nervous system (CNS). The &#954;-opioid receptor also seems to contribute partly to the production of the antitussive effect of the drugs. There is controversy as to whether &#948;-receptors are involved in promoting an antitussive effect. Peripheral opioid receptors seem to have certain limited roles. Although narcotic antitussives are the most potent antitussives at present, certain types of coughs, such as chronic cough, are particularly difficult to suppress even with codeine. In guinea pigs, coughs elicited by mechanical stimulation of the bifurcation of the trachea were not able to be suppressed by codeine. In gupigs with sub-acute bronchitis caused by SO2 gas exposure, coughing is difficult to inhibit with centrally acting antitussives such as codeine. Some studies suggest that neurokinins are involved in the development of codeine-resistant coughs. However, evidence supporting this claim is still insufficient. It is very important to characterize opiate-resistant coughs in experimental animals, and to determine which experimentally induced coughs correspond to which types of cough in humans. In this review, we describe the mechanisms of antitussive effects of narcotic antitussives, addressing codeine-sensitive and -resistant coughs, and including our own results.</description>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com/content/3/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Kazuo Takahama</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tetsuya Shirasaki</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Cough 2007, 3:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-07-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-9974-3-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Cough</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-9974</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-07-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/1/1/2">
        <title>An overview of the sensory receptors regulating cough</title>
        <description>The cough reflex represents a primary defensive mechanism for airway protection in a variety of mammalian species. However, excessive and inappropriate coughing can emerge as a primary presenting symptom of many airway diseases. Cough disorders are characterized by a reduction in the threshold for reflex initiation and, as a consequence, the occurrence of cough in response to stimuli that are normally innocuous in nature. The current therapeutic strategies for the treatment of cough disorders are only moderately effective. This undoubtedly relates in part to limitations in our understanding of the neural components comprising the cough reflex pathway. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of current concepts relating to the sensory innervation to the mammalian airways, focusing particularly on the sensory receptors that regulate cough. In addition, the review will highlight particular areas and issues relating to cough neurobiology that are creating controversy in the field.</description>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com/content/1/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Stuart Mazzone</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Cough 2005, 1:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2005-08-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-9974-1-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Cough</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-9974</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2005-08-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/3/1/5">
        <title>Chronic persistent cough in the community: A questionnaire survey</title>
        <description>Background:
Chronic cough is a common symptom which causes significant levels of morbidity. It is becoming increasingly well characterised by research taking place in specialist cough clinics, where successful treatment rates are high. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the symptom complex of chronic cough in the community. This report details the results of a postal questionnaire survey sent to individuals requesting further information on chronic cough.
Methods:
856 chronic cough questionnaires were sent out to members of the public who requested an information sheet following a national UK radio broadcast. Information regarding demography, history of cough, previous treatment and physical, psychological and social effects of the cough was elicited.
Results:
373 completed questionnaires were returned. Mean age was 65.3 years (SD 12.0, range 9&#8211;88 years). 73% were female and 2% current smokers. Median duration of cough was 6.5 years. 66% had no other coexisting respiratory diagnosis, whilst 24% reported asthma. Of those who responded, 91% had consulted a general practitioner regarding the cough and of them, 85% had been prescribed some sort of treatment. 61% had seen at least one hospital specialist. Commonly reported associated physical symptoms included breathlessness (55%), wheeze (37%), fatigue (72%) and disturbed sleep (70%). Incontinence occurred in 55% of women. Similarly, the majority reported psychological effects such as anger or frustration (83%), anxiety (69%) and depression (55%). 64% felt that the cough interfered with their social life.
Conclusion:
Chronic cough causes a high level of morbidity in the community, which results in a correspondingly high rate of healthcare utilisation. Demography and symptomatology seems to be similar to that reported from specialist centres, but successful treatment of the cough was uncommon, despite a high number of medical consultations in both primary and secondary care. If understanding of this debilitating but eminently treatable condition is enhanced, management of chronic cough will improve and many patients will be helped.</description>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com/content/3/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Caroline Everett</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jack Kastelik</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rachel Thompson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alyn Morice</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Cough 2007, 3:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-03-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-9974-3-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Cough</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-9974</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-03-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/4/1/5">
        <title>Gastroesophageal reflux-associated chronic cough in an adolescent and the diagnostic implications: a case report</title>
        <description>A 15-year-old girl was referred with a 2-year history of perennial non-productive cough, which had been preceded by Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia and subsequent asthma. Symptoms were only partially responsive to anti-asthma treatment including an inhaled corticosteroid and a leukotriene receptor antagonist. The patient&apos;s BMI was 27.8; she had gained over 10 kg in the previous two years. Typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease were not evident except for belch. Coughing worsened on eating and rising from bed. Although esophagography failed to disclose reflux esophagitis, esophageal pH monitoring revealed significant acid reflux. Asthma was considered well controlled. Treatment with the proton-pump inhibitor rabeprazole resulted in disappearance of cough. Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (FSSG) score, a questionnaire evaluating the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease, was initially high but normalized after treatment. Capsaicin cough sensitivity also diminished with treatment.Chronic cough due to gastroesophageal reflux disease has been considered rare in adolescents, but this condition might be increasing in line with the recent trend in adults. Clinical features of gastroesophageal reflux disease-associated cough typical for adult patients and a specific questionnaire for evaluating gastroesophageal reflux disease validated in adults may also be useful diagnostic clues in adolescents.</description>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com/content/4/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Makiko Jinnai</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Akio Niimi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Masaya Takemura</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hisako Matsumoto</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yoshitaka Konda</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michiaki Mishima</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Cough 2008, 4:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-07-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-9974-4-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Cough</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-9974</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-07-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/3">
        <title>Features of cough variant asthma and classic asthma during methacholine-induced brochoconstriction: a cross-sectional study</title>
        <description>Background:
Little is known regarding mechanistic and phenotypic differences between cough variant asthma (CVA), presenting with a chronic cough as the sole symptom that responds to bronchodilators, and classic asthma with wheezing during methacholine inhalation. Here we reported airway sensitivity, airway reactivity, and as the main concern, the appearance of cough and wheezes during methacholine inhalation in patients with CVA or classic asthma.
Methods:
We cross-sectionally examined the degrees of airway sensitivity, the point where resistance started to increase, and reactivity, the slope of the methacholine-resistance curve, and the appearance of cough and wheezes in steroid-na&#239;ve adult patients with classic asthma (n = 58) or CVA (n = 55) while they were continuously inhaling methacholine during simultaneous measurement of respiratory resistance.
Results:
Patients with CVA were less sensitive and less reactive to inhaled methacholine and wheezed less frequently but coughed more frequently during methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction than did patients with classic asthma. Multivariate analysis revealed that airway hypersensitivity and lower baseline FEV1/FVC were associated with the appearance of wheezes, whereas a diagnosis of CVA was associated with coughing.
Conclusion:
There are mechanistic and phenotypic differences between CVA and classic asthma during methacholine inhalation. Frequent coughing during bronchoconstriction may be a distinctive feature of CVA.</description>
        <link>http://www.coughjournal.com/content/5/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Hisako Matsumoto</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Akio Niimi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Masaya Takemura</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tetsuya Ueda</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Masafumi Yamaguchi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hirofumi Matsuoka</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Makiko Jinnai</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kazuo Chin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michiaki Mishima</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Cough 2009, 5:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-03-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-9974-5-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Cough</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-9974</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-03-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
